{
  "id": 2623541,
  "name": "John T. McKinney, Appellant, v. Board of Supervisors, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "McKinney v. Board of Supervisors",
  "decision_date": "1909-12-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "124",
  "last_page": "125",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 Ill. App. 124"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "134 Ill. App. 385",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2472194
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/134/0385-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1643,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08283861337089538
    },
    "sha256": "47da733ad480a9f4ed27066a63306f87ae3053cf8fa5e99a0a9d09bab6cdd617",
    "simhash": "1:1964ce2e489d667c",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:55:41.765695+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John T. McKinney, Appellant, v. Board of Supervisors, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant filed a petition in the Circuit Court of DeWitt county for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the board of supervisors of said county to appoint a regular practicing physician examiner of the blind, and cause the county clerk to register the relator\u2019s name as a person entitled to benefits for the blind, and to compel said board to provide an annual appropriation for the payment to relator of the sum of $150 per year from July 5, 1903, and a like sum annually thereafter as provided by statute. The court sustained a general and special demurrer to such petition and then entered judgment \u201cthat the defendants do have and recover of and from the plaintiff their costs and charges in this behalf expended and that execution do issue therefor.\u201d The judgment in question is not a final and appeal-able order, as it does not appear therefrom that the petition was dismissed. Meyer v. City of Decatur, 134 Ill. App. 385; Adams v. Bruner, ante, p. 123. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, at the cost of appellant, with leave to either party to move for final judgment in the Circuit Court.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Monson & Gray, for appellant.",
      "Herrick & Herrick, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John T. McKinney, Appellant, v. Board of Supervisors, Appellee.\nAppeals and ereoes\u2014what not final judgment. A judgment for costs against a petitioner in a proceeding for mandamus is not final \u2014to dispose of the costs the petition should he dismissed.\nMandamus. Appeal from the Circuit Court of De Witt county; the Hon. W. G. Cochran, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1908.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed December 15, 1909.\nMonson & Gray, for appellant.\nHerrick & Herrick, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0124-01",
  "first_page_order": 142,
  "last_page_order": 143
}
