{
  "id": 2627011,
  "name": "William B. Scott, Defendant in Error, v. George G. Caldwell and George J. Gilbert, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scott v. Caldwell",
  "decision_date": "1909-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 14,639",
  "first_page": "172",
  "last_page": "173",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "152 Ill. App. 172"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1382,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "sha256": "b4e4403b3b0086b639600b02c769a151acc4f31abf257fad3c148c0f518bdeb4",
    "simhash": "1:46338e88f7e39018",
    "word_count": 228
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:55:41.765695+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William B. Scott, Defendant in Error, v. George G. Caldwell and George J. Gilbert, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Mack\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAfter judgment in favor of Landon, the defendant in replevin suit, and the awarding of the writ of retorno habendo this suit' was begun on the replevin bond, because of the failure of the plaintiff in the replevin action to return the property.\nNo specific objection was made to the evidence offered of the bond and judgment in replevin. A general objection raises only the question of materiality.\nThe judgment on the merits in replevin established Landon\u2019s right to possession as lienor. The fact that he was conducting a warehouse of class \u201cC\u201d and had failed to issue a warehouse receipt is totally immaterial here, even if it could, in any way, have been material in the replevin suit.\nThe proof of damages sustains the finding and judgment of the court, which is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Mack"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John J. Weilman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Pringle, Northup & Terwilliger, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William B. Scott, Defendant in Error, v. George G. Caldwell and George J. Gilbert, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 14,639.\nEvidence\u2014effect of general objection. Only questions of materiality are raised by a general objection.\nAction of debt. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William W. Maxwell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1909.\nJohn J. Weilman, for plaintiff in error.\nPringle, Northup & Terwilliger, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0172-01",
  "first_page_order": 190,
  "last_page_order": 191
}
