{
  "id": 878182,
  "name": "Marianna Penkala, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Penkala v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1910-03-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 14,915",
  "first_page": "337",
  "last_page": "337",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "153 Ill. App. 337"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "240 Ill. 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3423184
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/240/0259-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "240 Ill. 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3423184
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/240/0259-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 964,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.030923038370190694
    },
    "sha256": "7da84f89de4ffc7b109dd66d959cf0c00e33d71efd1179030ddf4be640950d8b",
    "simhash": "1:9f65eefdb2bf12b8",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:18.031918+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Marianna Penkala, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Mack\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nSince this case was submitted, the Supreme Court has held in Walters v. City of Ottawa, 240 Ill. 259, that the plea of the statute of limitations is a good defense to a declaration in a cause of action for negligence against a city, amended after the statutory period had run by reciting that the statutory notice was duly .given.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Mack"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. W. Jaros, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Edward J. Brundage and John R. Caverly, for defendant in error; Edward C. Fitch of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Marianna Penkala, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 14,915.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in Walters v. City of Ottawa, 240 Ill. 259.\nAction in case for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentaho, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 18, 1910.\nF. W. Jaros, for plaintiff in error.\nEdward J. Brundage and John R. Caverly, for defendant in error; Edward C. Fitch of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0337-01",
  "first_page_order": 355,
  "last_page_order": 355
}