{
  "id": 5320131,
  "name": "John B. DeVoney, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Gaynor, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "DeVoney v. Gaynor",
  "decision_date": "1910-11-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,643",
  "first_page": "72",
  "last_page": "73",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 Ill. App. 72"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 1008,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.552,
    "sha256": "8d803a62d023aa702817864fe05e8763c5b47351cb3f61a98d046149bb94ccba",
    "simhash": "1:6b77dc378d86b199",
    "word_count": 168
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:35.030835+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John B. DeVoney, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Gaynor, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam,\nA motion of defendant in error to strike the stenographic report of the proceedings from the record has heretofore been sustained. None of the assigned errors can be considered in the absence of a bill of exceptions or such stenographic report.\nOn motion of defendant in error, the writ of error will therefore be dismissed.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William H. Tatge, for plaintiff in error; Gavin & Mayer, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John B. DeVoney, Defendant in Error, v. Thomas Gaynor, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 16,643.\nAppeals and erbobs\u2014when writ of error dismissed. A writ of error to review a judgment rendered by the Municipal Court will be dismissed if the stenographic report has been stricken, and the errors assigned cannot be considered in the absence of a stenographic report.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. W. H. Dietrich, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.\nWrit of error dismissed.\nOpinion filed November 18, 1910.\nWilliam H. Tatge, for plaintiff in error; Gavin & Mayer, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0072-01",
  "first_page_order": 90,
  "last_page_order": 91
}