{
  "id": 5320147,
  "name": "F. A. Bingham, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joshua L. Jones, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bingham v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1910-12-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,237",
  "first_page": "97",
  "last_page": "98",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 Ill. App. 97"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1407,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "sha256": "92b2799b36daceeadc31c62868f939f01f891fb9a0e9eb7f706f14f908bd6968",
    "simhash": "1:c5c6de3b681fcaf9",
    "word_count": 228
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:35.030835+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. A. Bingham, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joshua L. Jones, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Mack\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nPlaintiff claims to have loaned money to the defendant and to have performed legal services for him. His testimony is in part supported by that of his stenographer. It is directly contradicted by defendant who claims that all the money was advanced in part payment for certain shares of a corporation of which plaintiff was a director, and defendant the principal share holder and that the legal services, too, were for the corporation.\nThe surrounding circumstances support defendant. A jury believed him; the trial judge concurred, and we cannot find that the preponderance of the evidence is against their conclusion.\nIf we had considered only the abstract in this case we might have reached a contrary conclusion. The record however gives a different impression from that conveyed by the totally inadequate abstract. .\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Mack"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. A. Bingham, plaintiff in error, pro se.",
      "Michael Feinberg, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. A. Bingham, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joshua L. Jones, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 15,237.\nVerdicts\u2014when not disturbed as against the evidence. A verdict' will not be set aside as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly so.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 2, 1910.\nF. A. Bingham, plaintiff in error, pro se.\nMichael Feinberg, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0097-01",
  "first_page_order": 115,
  "last_page_order": 116
}