{
  "id": 5321764,
  "name": "May Gassman, Defendant in Error, v. Edward Gassman, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gassman v. Gassman",
  "decision_date": "1911-01-24",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,180",
  "first_page": "502",
  "last_page": "502",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "159 Ill. App. 502"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1021,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "961b723f810da59a7894633e7c5f86129aaa62d4f94684c3e795c56c836797d5",
    "simhash": "1:c33f40fc916788fc",
    "word_count": 169
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:33:35.030835+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "May Gassman, Defendant in Error, v. Edward Gassman, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Mack\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nPlaintiff sued her father for $303.50 loaned to him. He claimed that it was his own money. In addition he claims by way of set-off for board and lodging furnished the plaintiff.\nNo controverted questions of law are presented by this record. We agree with the conclusions of the trial judge, to whom the cause was submitted without a jury, that a preponderance of the evidence sustains plaintiff\u2019s claim and fails to sustain defendant\u2019s set-off.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Mack"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. M. Shaffner, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John F. Haas, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "May Gassman, Defendant in Error, v. Edward Gassman, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,180.\nMunicipal Coubt\u2014when judgment affirmed. A finding of the trial court where supported by the preponderance of the evidence, will he affirmed on appeal.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 24, 1911.\nB. M. Shaffner, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn F. Haas, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0502-01",
  "first_page_order": 520,
  "last_page_order": 520
}