#### Herbert L. Joseph & Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mrs. F. Perkins et al., Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 15,590.

Enromas of cotjbt—when not disturbed. The finding by the court in a trial at law will not necessarily be disturbed even though the testimony is not as clear and satisfactory as might be desired.

Attachment. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at" the October term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1911.

Bernard J. Brown, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought a suit in attachment against defendants in error on the ground Mrs. Perkins was about to remove her property from the State, etc. The cause was submitted to the court, without a jury, who found for the plaintiff in error on the merits and entered judgment for $179. On the attachment issue the court found for defendants in error and quashed the attachment, of which plaintiff in error complains.

The question was one of fact for the court, and while the testimony was not clear and satisfactory as might be desired, we are not disposed to disturb the finding.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.