{
  "id": 2723387,
  "name": "The People, for use State Board of Health, Appellant, v. A. M. Bochner, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Bochner",
  "decision_date": "1911-05-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "591",
  "last_page": "592",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "161 Ill. App. 591"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "249 Ill. 195",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5644234
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/249/0195-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "249 Ill. 195",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5644234
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/249/0195-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1336,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08383809249110663
    },
    "sha256": "65512656d89a0de0217525e57b9c781c3bcee6386e1a654819ddc5bb138ce922",
    "simhash": "1:82c246bf50793af4",
    "word_count": 227
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:57:31.944651+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People, for use State Board of Health, Appellant, v. A. M. Bochner, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Puterbaugh\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis appeal is from a judgment for the defendant rendered in an action in debt for the recovery of a penalty for selling medicine as an itinerant vendor, without first having secured a certificate from the State Board of Health as provided by section 8, paragraph 12, chapter 91 of \u201cAn Act to Regulate the Practice of Medicine in the State of Illinois.\u201d\nThe section of the statute in question has since this appeal was perfected been declared to be unconstitutional, for the reason that the practical effect of the same, so far as patent or proprietary medicines are concerned, is to give druggists a monopoly of the sale of such medicines, the license fee required to be paid by itinerant vendors being so high as practically to prohibit them from engaging in such business. People v. Wilson, 249 Ill. 195.\nThe judgment is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Puterbaugh"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank L. Hatch, for appellant.",
      "Alonzo Hoff, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People, for use State Board of Health, Appellant, v. A. M. Bochner, Appellee.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People v. Wilson, 249 Ill. 195.\nAction in debt. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. Robert B. Shirley, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the November term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 26, 1911.\nFrank L. Hatch, for appellant.\nAlonzo Hoff, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0591-01",
  "first_page_order": 633,
  "last_page_order": 634
}