{
  "id": 2729665,
  "name": "William Hindley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Boston Store, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hindley v. Store",
  "decision_date": "1911-06-16",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,580",
  "first_page": "440",
  "last_page": "440",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "162 Ill. App. 440"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 90,
    "char_count": 931,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "3fc3e49ef6f5bceba15abfcdde72f542681004df398c6757fdc555b680f4c626",
    "simhash": "1:1eb5c22df02e9eed",
    "word_count": 149
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:09:35.474007+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Hindley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Boston Store, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis cause has had two trials in the Municipal Court, both trials resulting in verdicts for the defendant. The case involves twenty-two cents and a large amount of indignation. We find no error in the record for which the judgment should be reversed. It is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Hindley, plaintiff in error, pro se.",
      "Hoses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for defendant in error; Harry H. Krinsky, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Hindley, Plaintiff in Error, v. Boston Store, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 15,580.\nMunicipal Court\u2014when judgment not disturbed. The Appellate Court will not reverse a judgment of the Municipal Court if it is satisfied that substantial justice is done thereby.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Eberhardt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 16, 1911.\nWilliam Hindley, plaintiff in error, pro se.\nHoses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for defendant in error; Harry H. Krinsky, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0440-01",
  "first_page_order": 460,
  "last_page_order": 460
}