{
  "id": 2731065,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Hunt",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,800",
  "first_page": "628",
  "last_page": "629",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "162 Ill. App. 628"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "245 Ill. 268",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3407396
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/245/0268-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1697,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6014588109190921
    },
    "sha256": "eb844ff324bc8098a6ecd0f7ee5529f2b36012c299db8fa9bee417a73b556111",
    "simhash": "1:d34fe44bd15e0c5e",
    "word_count": 287
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:09:35.474007+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baldwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nA criminal complaint was filed against plaintiff in error in the Municipal Court of Chicago, charging her with larceny of several small articles of an aggregate value of $2.75 from Bothschild & Company on the 3rd day of July, 1909.\nAbout the middle of that month, she waived a jury and was tried before one of the judges of that court, who found her guilty of the charge, and imposed a sentence of imprisonment for one day in the county jail, together with a fine of $4.50 and costs. This judgment and sentence she seeks to reverse in this court, urging, in argument, principally the ground that the evidence fails to sustain the conviction.\nIn the case of People v. Russell, 245 Ill. 268, our Supreme Court held that the offense here charged against plaintiff in error, and of which she was convicted, is an infamous crime, and can only be prosecuted upon indictment by a grand jury. Under this decision, the Municipal Court was without jurisdiction in this case, and, therefore, the judgment must he reversed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baldwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles M. Thomson, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John E. W. Watman, for defendant in error; Otto B. Schram, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Zaidee Hunt, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,800.\nMunicipal Court\u2014when without jurisdiction, of criminal cause. The Municipal Court of the city of Chicago has no jurisdiction to entertain a prosecution for an infamous crime.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Jr., Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909.\nReversed.\nOpinion on rehearing filed October 3, 1911.\nCharles M. Thomson, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn E. W. Watman, for defendant in error; Otto B. Schram, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0628-01",
  "first_page_order": 648,
  "last_page_order": 649
}