{
  "id": 2737628,
  "name": "Lee J. Spear, Defendant in Error, v. J. C. Haggarty, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Spear v. Haggarty",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,691",
  "first_page": "27",
  "last_page": "28",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "163 Ill. App. 27"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1197,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.498,
    "sha256": "98b70902f261eb2d19aff0e8a7005808d87406c7ddae714bb7e2218384bfdceb",
    "simhash": "1:463e168310ed88dd",
    "word_count": 205
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:45:41.237543+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lee J. Spear, Defendant in Error, v. J. C. Haggarty, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nRecovery was had for $83, being rent for an apartment for two months and part of a third.\nThe only defense interposed was that the apartment had not been renovated as required by the terms of the lease.\nThe trial was had before the court and a jury, the court, however, directing the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff.\nNo question of law is involved. We have examined the record and find nothing in it to justify the claim of the defendant that the clause of the lease which provided that the flat should be thoroughly renovated had not been complied with.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas M. Poynton, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Dellenback, Riese & Cody, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lee J. Spear, Defendant in Error, v. J. C. Haggarty, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,691.\nInstructions\u2014when peremptory proper. It is proper for the court peremptorily to direct a verdict for the plaintiff in the absence of any evidence tending to establish the defense interposed. ------\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John C. Scovel, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 3, 1911.\nThomas M. Poynton, for plaintiff in error.\nDellenback, Riese & Cody, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0027-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 48
}