{
  "id": 2738033,
  "name": "Hattie V. Samberg, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sophia Kelly, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Samberg v. Kelly",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,817",
  "first_page": "395",
  "last_page": "395",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "163 Ill. App. 395"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1484,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "sha256": "b7a2d6c91883e555b7c912c327f613104e751b58a76e397eee0cb29334205ea0",
    "simhash": "1:17d60e860496cc8f",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:45:41.237543+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hattie V. Samberg, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sophia Kelly, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis suit in replevin for certain household goods was decided by the Municipal Court in favor of the defendant below, who is therefore defendant in error here. A writ of retorno habendo was ordered and a judgment for costs entered in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff.\nThe Municipal Court was right in its judgment. The suit was based on a supposed lien given to the plaintiff or a conditional sale by her. Neither was, in our opinion, proved. It would be a dangerous precedent to hold that such a conversation as was sworn to by the witness Brockhyser gave such a lien or made a sale absolute on its face and evidenced in writing, a conditional one.\nThe plaintiff moreover affirmed the sale as an abso\u00ablute one by her suit in assumpsit for the purchase price.\nThe cook stove was only to be returned in exchange for the one mentioned in the bill of sale.\nThe judgment of the Municipal Court is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles J. O \u2019Connor, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William H. A. Rust, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hattie V. Samberg, Plaintiff in Error, v. Sophia Kelly, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 15,817.\nLiens\u2014when not established. Held, under the evidence, that the lien claimed in the action of replevin reviewed was not established.\nReplevin. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1911.\nCharles J. O \u2019Connor, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam H. A. Rust, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0395-01",
  "first_page_order": 415,
  "last_page_order": 415
}