{
  "id": 2736587,
  "name": "Minnie H. Barton, Defendant in Error, v. James E. Keelyn, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barton v. Keelyn",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,771",
  "first_page": "429",
  "last_page": "430",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "163 Ill. App. 429"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 Ill. App. 477",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5316303
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/156/0477-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "155 Ill. App. 681",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5317768
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/155/0681-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "248 Ill. 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3394408
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/248/0259-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "244 Ill. 570",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3411993
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/244/0570-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1755,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08395199874587284
    },
    "sha256": "3e2d5b58816d4befb45204fe8ef7403ebf7cf381157841b8d8acd568e8d4ed34",
    "simhash": "1:8343d20d11670888",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:45:41.237543+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Minnie H. Barton, Defendant in Error, v. James E. Keelyn, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nA judgment was entered in this, a fourth class case, in the Municipal Court of Chicago June 11, 1909.\nWithin thirty days thereafter, on July 8th, an order was entered on the stipulation of the parties that the time to file a bill of exceptions be extended to include July 24, 1909. On July 23rd another order was entered on the stipulation of the parties that the time to file a bill of exceptions be extended to include August 9, 1909. On August 9th a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial was signed and filed.\nOn this writ of error the defendant in error moves the court to strike from the record said stenographic report because same was not filed within the first extension of time as provided by the statute. Under the authority of Lassers v. North German Steamship Co., 244 Ill. 570; Haines v. Danderine Co., 248 Ill. 259; Lakeside Fish & Oyster Co. v. Mutual Fish Co., 155 Ill. App. 681; Devine, Adm\u2019r. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 156 Ill. App. 477, the motion is allowed.\nNo error appearing in the record as it remains the judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Church & Sherburne, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Minnie H. Barton, Defendant in Error, v. James E. Keelyn, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,771.\nMunicipal Court\u2014when statement of facts properly stricken. A statement of facts not filed within thirty days of the judgment date or within such further time as may have been provided by order entered within such time, is properly stricken.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. McKenzie Cleland, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1911.\nChurch & Sherburne, for plaintiff in error.\nMayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0429-01",
  "first_page_order": 449,
  "last_page_order": 450
}