{
  "id": 2803773,
  "name": "Henry Payette, Defendant in Error, v. Leopold Zeman, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Payette v. Zeman",
  "decision_date": "1911-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,706",
  "first_page": "274",
  "last_page": "275",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "165 Ill. App. 274"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1470,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.513,
    "sha256": "b0f7bc2c5a97573ddd8b0574499a0902d740b2225cc223d9272b3faa49f9986d",
    "simhash": "1:c7e2031e0a3192e8",
    "word_count": 247
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:57:00.735598+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Payette, Defendant in Error, v. Leopold Zeman, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis suit was brought by the defendant in error to recover from plaintiff in error the balance claimed to be due on architect\u2019s certificates for carpenter work on, a building at 2956 South State street. The cause was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and on a remittitur a judgment was entered for $191.99 against the defendant, here the plaintiff in error.\nIt is urged that the verdict was clearly and manifestly against the preponderance of the evidence. There was a sharp conflict in the testimony, but on a consideration of the same we are unable to agree with the plaintiff in error.\nOther errors are assigned, but those well taken are unimportant and of such technical nature that we do not think the merits of the case were affected by said errors.\nThere appearing no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kretzinger, Rooney & Kretzinger and E. C. Mapledoram, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry Payette, Defendant in Error, v. Leopold Zeman, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,706.\nVerdicts\u2014when not disturbed. A verdict will not be set aside on review as against the weight of the evidence unless clearly and manifestly so.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1911.\nRehearing denied October 23, 1911.\nKretzinger, Rooney & Kretzinger and E. C. Mapledoram, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0274-01",
  "first_page_order": 292,
  "last_page_order": 293
}