{
  "id": 8499616,
  "name": "Sarah Walensky, Defendant in Error, v. United States Grand Lodge of the Independent Order Brith Abraham, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Walensky v. United States Grand Lodge of the Independent Order Brith Abraham",
  "decision_date": "1911-11-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 15,854",
  "first_page": "214",
  "last_page": "215",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 Ill. App. 214"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 Ill. App. 477",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5316303
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/156/0477-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "155 Ill. App. 681",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5317768
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/155/0681-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "248 Ill. 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3394408
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/248/0259-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "247 Ill. 27",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3398169
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/247/0027-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "244 Ill. 570",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3411993
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/244/0570-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1718,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20506871250022685
    },
    "sha256": "fe4f8b4d60f147032d560cd41d16679eda258f1b201dd2a71cc0aad536082530",
    "simhash": "1:0a4856ad11c99a2f",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:11.617746+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sarah Walensky, Defendant in Error, v. United States Grand Lodge of the Independent Order Brith Abraham, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Smith\ndelivered tlie opinion of the court.\nA judgment was entered in this, a fourth class case, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, July 29, 1909, for the sum of $500. On August 25, 1909, an order was entered that the time to file a hill of exceptions he extended thirty days from date. On September 22, 1909, an order was entered that the time to file a hill of exceptions he extended thirty days from date. On October 22, 1909, a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial was filed.\nThe defendant in error moves the court to strike from the record said stenographic report because same was not filed within the first extension of time given therefor, as provided by the statute. Under the authority of Lassers v. North German Steamship Co., 244 Ill. 570; Wurlitzer Co. v. Dickinson, 247 Ill. 27; Haines v. Danderine Co., 248 Ill. 259; Lakeside Fish & Oyster Co. v. Mutual Fish Co., 155 Ill. App. 681, and Devine, Adm\u2019r, v. Prudential Ins. Co., 156 Ill. App. 477, the motion is allowed.\nNo error appearing in the remaining record, the judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Samuels & Samuels, for plaintiff in error.",
      "HobNStbiN & Fisher, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sarah Walensky, Defendant in Error, v. United States Grand Lodge of the Independent Order Brith Abraham, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 15,854.\nMunicipal court \u2014 when stenographic report stricken. A stenographic report not filed within thirty days after the judgment date or within an extension of time granted within such period of thirty days, will he stricken.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1909.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 20, 1911.\nSamuels & Samuels, for plaintiff in error.\nHobNStbiN & Fisher, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0214-01",
  "first_page_order": 244,
  "last_page_order": 245
}