{
  "id": 8499918,
  "name": "Martin Madson, Appellee, v. James W. Clark, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Madson v. Clark",
  "decision_date": "1911-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,143",
  "first_page": "442",
  "last_page": "442",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 Ill. App. 442"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1131,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "sha256": "2c4d269b9f25f37496d5bd2aefeb43cd0d0c2ac700532c00480d57585893ce72",
    "simhash": "1:031b04e59add12c4",
    "word_count": 181
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:11.617746+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Martin Madson, Appellee, v. James W. Clark, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nThis is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court finding the appellant Clark guilty of and punishing him for a contempt of that court in violating the same prohibitory injunction forming part of the decree described in the opinion in cause number 15959 in this court, filed contemporaneously herewith, which decree has been reversed by the Appellate Court as stated in that opinion. (Ante, p. 441.)\nAs therein stated also, there is no longer any contention that contempt proceedings should be enforced or sustained, and the order of the Superior Court herein appealed from is therefore reversed.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edwy LogaN Reeves- and Harvey Strickles, for appellant. ' \u2022",
      "J. Erb, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Martin Madson, Appellee, v. James W. Clark, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,143.\nContempt \u2014 when conviction reversed. A conviction for violating a prohibitory injunction forming a part of the decree will be reversed where such decree has been reversed.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1911.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1911.\nEdwy LogaN Reeves- and Harvey Strickles, for appellant. ' \u2022\nJ. Erb, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0442-01",
  "first_page_order": 474,
  "last_page_order": 474
}