{
  "id": 8500386,
  "name": "William Schmidt et al., Appellees, v. William M. Johnson et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schmidt v. Johnson",
  "decision_date": "1912-01-16",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,092",
  "first_page": "622",
  "last_page": "622",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "166 Ill. App. 622"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1320,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.436,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3936576997346177
    },
    "sha256": "34fb3eadeb3c7dd3fbadcb7692d5ab5fa392b306cb4b1dab6e4fd104a7586b06",
    "simhash": "1:29660667ce65943a",
    "word_count": 221
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:05:11.617746+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Schmidt et al., Appellees, v. William M. Johnson et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThere is brought up for review by this appeal and by the one which follows it, No. 18093, the action of the Circuit Court of Cook County, in chancery, in appointing a receiver of the Fidelity Amusement Company and also a receiver of the Riverview Park Company.\nThe two appeals were heard together in this court, and for convenience the facts hearing upon the case are more fully considered in the opinion rendered this day in the case last mentioned, being on the appeal of the Riverview Park Company. (Post, p. 623.) For the reasons stated in that opinion, we think no error was committed by the chancellor in appointing a receiver of the Fidelity Amusement Company, and his action in that respect is approved and the order affirmed.\nOrder affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bither, G-off & Francis, for appellant.",
      "Helmer, MoultoN & WhitmaN and Lloyd C. Whitman, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Schmidt et al., Appellees, v. William M. Johnson et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 18,092.\nThis ease is controlled by the decision in Schmidt v. Johnson, post, p. 623.\nInterlocutory appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. C. M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 16, 1912.\nRehearing denied January 30, 1912.\nBither, G-off & Francis, for appellant.\nHelmer, MoultoN & WhitmaN and Lloyd C. Whitman, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0622-01",
  "first_page_order": 654,
  "last_page_order": 654
}