{
  "id": 2797274,
  "name": "Fred Ponow, Defendant in Error, v. Fred Siller, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ponow v. Siller",
  "decision_date": "1912-02-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,224",
  "first_page": "554",
  "last_page": "555",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "167 Ill. App. 554"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1468,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "sha256": "95dab2b59a16290cb72f92b2e60c766eee65b126a770692a2e1d5110dd506793",
    "simhash": "1:1f1bdc897114237f",
    "word_count": 244
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:43:24.567643+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Fred Ponow, Defendant in Error, v. Fred Siller, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nIn this ease of the fourth class, a trial in the Municipal Court, by the Court without a jury, resulted in a finding and judgment against plaintiff in error for $109.75, to reverse which judgment he prosecutes this writ of error.\nThe assignments of error question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding and judgment, and the application by the court of the law to the facts in evidence.\nNeither the record nor the abstract of the same contains a statement of the facts appearing upon the trial, or a stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial. The .questions involved are, therefore, not preserved for review and the judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George E. Brannan and M. L. Igoe, for plaintiff in \u25a0error.",
      "Prystalski & Dahlberg, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Fred Ponow, Defendant in Error, v. Fred Siller, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 16,224.\nAppeals and errors\u2014when sufficiency of evidence not presented for review. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding and judgment is not presented for review if neither the record nor the abstract of the same contains a statement of the facts appearing upon the trial or a stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Mancha Bruggemeter, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 21, 1912.\nGeorge E. Brannan and M. L. Igoe, for plaintiff in \u25a0error.\nPrystalski & Dahlberg, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0554-01",
  "first_page_order": 574,
  "last_page_order": 575
}