{
  "id": 2763648,
  "name": "James E. Tate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minnie C. Roberts, Edward P. Roberts and James Corlett, Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tate v. Roberts",
  "decision_date": "1912-10-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,901",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "70",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "173 Ill. App. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "102 Ill. App. 194",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2592024
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/102/0194-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1652,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08416977206006991
    },
    "sha256": "87acd020cdfb37fad4e485a851d1b14bb2b7f03cd8fa26332bb82a0f4bfd7dfe",
    "simhash": "1:c7139c45d56fa49b",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:18:39.035248+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James E. Tate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minnie C. Roberts, Edward P. Roberts and James Corlett, Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n\u25a0 This is before us by writ of error for review of an order of the chancellor in the Superior Court sustaining a demurrer to what is called a bill of review, filed by the plaintiff in error.\nUpon an examination of the abstract of record, we do not find anything from which we can determine the character, nature or contents of the document, a demurrer to which apparently was sustained. Not a line or word of the recitals of the document is given. The only reference to it are the words \u201cbill of review,\u201d and nothing appears as to the grounds of the demurrer. The alleged abstract of record is merely an index. (Hughes v. Humphreys, 102 Ill. App. 194.)\nWe must therefore presume that the ruling of the chancellor in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill was correct, and the decree is afirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moses D. Brown, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Hutchins & Rippel, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James E. Tate, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minnie C. Roberts, Edward P. Roberts and James Corlett, Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 16,901.\nAppeals and errors\u2014when ruling of chancellor presumed to be correct. On a writ of error to the Appellate Court for the review of a chancellor\u2019s order sustaining a demurrer to a bill of review, such ruling will be presumed to be correct where the abstract of the record does not show anything as to the nature or character of such bill, or as to the grounds for the demurrer.\nError to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin I. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 3, 1912.\nMoses D. Brown, for plaintiff in error.\nHutchins & Rippel, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0069-01",
  "first_page_order": 87,
  "last_page_order": 88
}
