{
  "id": 2764054,
  "name": "Robert Good, Appellant, v. Wilton Lackaye, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Good v. Lackaye",
  "decision_date": "1912-10-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,938",
  "first_page": "79",
  "last_page": "79",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "173 Ill. App. 79"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1301,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "0a7f0a5d70ad50a14043cc601e5e203ed5496ac41849d1063337d368904ab4fe",
    "simhash": "1:006e2863344b62f8",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:18:39.035248+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert Good, Appellant, v. Wilton Lackaye, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe only question involved in this case is as to the value of professional services rendered by the appellant, a dentist, for Mrs. Lackaye, the wife of appellee. The dentist claimed that his work was worth $362. A jury, after hearing the evidence, brought in a verdict, but for what amount does not appear in the abstract of record. Neither is the amount of the judgment shown. Therefore, if for no other reason, the judgment must be affirmed. In counsel\u2019s brief and argument it is stated that the verdict of the jury was for $50. Assuming this to be correct, we cannot say from a consideration of the evidence that the verdict was wrong.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hugh A. Caperton, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert Good, Appellant, v. Wilton Lackaye, Appellee.\nGen. No. 16,938.\nAppeals and errors\u2014abstract. Where the only question raised on appeal is as to the value of the professional services, and the abstract of the record does not show what the amount of the verdict or judgment was, the judgment will be affirmed.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Edward M. Mangan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 3, 1912.\nHugh A. Caperton, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0079-01",
  "first_page_order": 97,
  "last_page_order": 97
}