{
  "id": 2761782,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Lawrence De Mas, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. De Mas",
  "decision_date": "1912-10-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,187",
  "first_page": "130",
  "last_page": "131",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "173 Ill. App. 130"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "170 Ill. App. 537",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2778480
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/170/0537-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 175,
    "char_count": 2504,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.580177559389593e-08,
      "percentile": 0.488814984966305
    },
    "sha256": "417dcb50d218cffc630dcb5711df53aff00f9b44ed8947fedf2155aeae995913",
    "simhash": "1:473bc53818af1e3d",
    "word_count": 434
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:18:39.035248+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Lawrence De Mas, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe plaintiff in error was arrested upon a capias issued upon an information sworn to by Lena Burkett, charging him with the crime of pandering. A jury trial was waived and trial had by the court, which found De Mas guilty, and he was sentenced.\nIt is claimed that the information is-insufficient in that (1) it nowhere alleges that Lena Burkett is a \u201cfemale person(2) it is not alleged that she was induced to remain therein \u201cas such inmate(3) the information begins by saying that Lena Burkett comes \u201cin his own proper person.\u201d\nThe first two objections go merely to the form of the information and not to the substantive offense charged. No motion to quash the information was made, nor any motion for a new trial or in arrest of judgment. It is too late now to complain of informality in the information (Hurd\u2019s Illinois Statutes, Chapter 38 Div. XI., Secs., 6 and 9). As to the third point, it appears elsewhere in the information more than once that Lena Burkett is a female. Furthermore, the name \u201cLena\u201d imports a person of the female sex. People v. Pizzi, 170 Ill. App. 537.\nA suggestion is made that the waiver of a jury trial being signed by plaintiff in error making his mark, is not sufficient. Such a signing is sufficient. The judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Gray Lucas, for appellant.",
      "John E. W. Wayman, for appellee; Zach Hofheimer, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Lawrence De Mas, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 17,187.\n1. Pandering\u2014information. Objections to an information charging pandering that it does not allege that the person is a \u201cfemale person\u201d and that she was induced to .remain \u201cas such inmate\u201d go merely to the form.\n2. Pandering\u2014appeals and error. On appeal from a judgment on an information charging pandering it is too late to complain of informalities in the information.\n3. Pandering\u2014sufficiency of information. An information charging pandering is not insufficient because it begins by saying that Lena Burkett comes \u201cin his own proper person,\u201d where it elsewhere appears that such person is a female and furthermore the name \u201cLena\u201d imports a person of the female sex.\n4. Jury\u2014waiver of jury trial. A waiver of jury trial signed by the defendant by making his mark is sufficient.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 3, 1912.\nJ. Gray Lucas, for appellant.\nJohn E. W. Wayman, for appellee; Zach Hofheimer, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0130-01",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 149
}