#### Peter H. Haffman for use of Chicago Gravel Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jennie S. Paradis and Bankers Surety Company, Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 18,693.

Municipal courts—when writ of error must he sued out. A writ "of error not sued out in a fourth class case in a municipal court of Chicago within thirty days after entry of the final order, as provided by the Municipal Court Act, § 33, will be dismissed.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Oscar M. Tobrison, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court *559at the October term, 1912.

Writ of error dismissed.

Opinion filed December 12, 1912.

Ullman, Hoag & Davidson, for plaintiff in error.

Rinaker & Beerly and E. C. Mapledoram, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

This is a case of the fourth class in

the Municipal Court, and the defendant in error moves to dismiss the writ of error for failure to sue out the same within thirty days after the entry of the final order, as provided by section 23 of the Municipal Court Act.

The judgment of the Municipal Court which is sought to be reviewed was entered on January 10, 1912, and the writ of error herein was sued out on July 8, 1912, which was considerably more than thirty days thereafter.

Following the decision of this court in Novelty Tufting Mach. Co. v. Peters & Roberts Furn. Co., 170 Ill. App. 134, the motion to dismiss is allowed.

Writ of error dismissed.