{
  "id": 2760222,
  "name": "Mercantile Credit Company, Appellant, v. Michael Richman et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mercantile Credit Co. v. Richman",
  "decision_date": "1912-10-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,522",
  "first_page": "181",
  "last_page": "182",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "174 Ill. App. 181"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "117 Ill. 137",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2893641
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/117/0137-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Ill. App. 434",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5279100
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/89/0434-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1434,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08413173895466493
    },
    "sha256": "9a1d66ca550d8b6eaf1159a3dce3489469f75c3c71dcae64a1fa891501681739",
    "simhash": "1:78da63e36deb34b8",
    "word_count": 229
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:56:54.106977+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mercantile Credit Company, Appellant, v. Michael Richman et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice F. A. Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nIn this case a capias ad respondendum was issued for the arrest of appellees, defendants. On their motion the court entered an order quashing the writ and discharging the bail of defendants. Appellant prosecutes this appeal from that order, and from orders overruling its motion for leave to file an amended affidavit for capias and its motion for the imposition of terms in connection with the order quashing the capias.\nThe orders appealed from are not final. Appeals lie from final orders, judgments and decrees only, except in cases specially provided for by statute. The record discloses no final judgment in the case. The motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal is sustained. Fitzsimmons v. Giddings, 89 Ill. App. 434; Farson v. Gorham, 117 Ill. 137.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice F. A. Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank Schoenfeld, for appellant.",
      "Samuels & Samuels, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mercantile Credit Company, Appellant, v. Michael Richman et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 17,522.\nAppeals and ebbobs\u2014final orders. Orders quashing a writ \u201cof capias ad respondendum and discharging defendant\u2019s hail, and overruling motion to impose terms in connection with the order quashing the capias, are not final and appealable.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed October 22, 1912.\nFrank Schoenfeld, for appellant.\nSamuels & Samuels, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0181-01",
  "first_page_order": 199,
  "last_page_order": 200
}