{
  "id": 2761612,
  "name": "Causetta Posey, Appellee, v. William B. Graham, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Posey v. Graham",
  "decision_date": "1912-11-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,776",
  "first_page": "304",
  "last_page": "305",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "174 Ill. App. 304"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "100 Ill. App. 5",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2598963
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/100/0005-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "157 Ill. 395",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        3142021
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/157/0395-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 171,
    "char_count": 2212,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08414486713318035
    },
    "sha256": "3d456e3b9de24a001365493184ce3ebe504e5108f80765d1ad7e4ab3571c9019",
    "simhash": "1:a535d2286b2760eb",
    "word_count": 379
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:56:54.106977+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Causetta Posey, Appellee, v. William B. Graham, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nA motion in this case has been made by the appellee to dismiss the appeal. The record filed consists of the bill of exceptions and copy of the declaration, pleas of the defendant, replication of the plaintiff to the pleas, and appeal bond. No transcript of the judgment appears.\nSection 100 of the Practice Act provides that \u201cAuthenticated copies of records of judgments, orders and decrees appealed from any court to the Appellate Courts shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the Appellate Court on or before the second day of the succeeding term of said court: * * * otherwise the said appeal shall be dismissed.\u201d If this provision of the statute is not complied with (and it was not in this case) this court has no jurisdiction. Pardridge v. Morgenthau, 157 Ill. 395; O\u2019Donnell v. Quinn, 100 Ill. App. 5. No application for further time in which to file a proper copy of the record was made to this court before the expiration of the time fixed for filing such copy.\nThe appellant insists that section 81 of the Practice Act, as amended in 1911, has in effect amended the provisions of section 100, but we cannot agree with him. in that regard. Section 81 relates principally to bills of exceptions, and does not purport to amend section 100; nor can it be said in any way to be the basis of the jurisdiction of this court.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rogan & Mahoney, for appellant; J. Kentneb Elliot and Howard M. Haepel, of counsel.",
      "John F. Haas, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Causetta Posey, Appellee, v. William B. Graham, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,776.\nAppeals and ebboes\u2014necessary that record contain transcript of judgment. Where a record does not contain a transcript of judgment as provided by the Practice Act, section 100, the appellate court has no jurisdiction and an appeal will be dismissed. Section 81 as amended in 1911, has not in effect amended the provision of section 100.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. David T. Smiley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed November 12, 1912.\nRehearing denied and opinion modified and refiled November 26, 1912.\nRogan & Mahoney, for appellant; J. Kentneb Elliot and Howard M. Haepel, of counsel.\nJohn F. Haas, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0304-01",
  "first_page_order": 322,
  "last_page_order": 323
}