{
  "id": 5353777,
  "name": "Frank F. Kellogg, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kellogg v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1912-12-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,661",
  "first_page": "136",
  "last_page": "137",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "176 Ill. App. 136"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1621,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "e032fe522e55a83c9c5bda0a14303ad66766c1a3182251963ddb960946494555",
    "simhash": "1:1b43569f9589bba8",
    "word_count": 280
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:47:28.669055+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank F. Kellogg, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe plaintiff in error began a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant in error to recover the sum of $64.84 and interest thereon claimed to be due him as rebate on a special assessment. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury. The court found for the defendant and entered judgment thereon, and the plaintiff sued out this writ of error.\nThere is in the record neither a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial nor a correct statement of facts by the trial judge, as required by the Municipal Court Act. What purports to he a correct statement of facts is manifestly not a statement of the facts by the judge as required by the law, but merely a statement that a witness gave testimony in relation to certain things.\nThe record disclosing no reversible error, the judg- \u2022 ment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry Brown and George Emmicke, for plaintiff in error; Lemuel M. Ackley, of counsel.",
      "George A. Mason and Edgar H. Hart, for defendant in error; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank F. Kellogg, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Chicago, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 16,661.\nMunich?An courts\u2014when statement of facts is insufficient. A purported statement of facts by a judge of the Municipal Court of Chicago that is merely a statement that a witness gave testimony in relation to certain things is not sufficient.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 30, 1912.\nHarry Brown and George Emmicke, for plaintiff in error; Lemuel M. Ackley, of counsel.\nGeorge A. Mason and Edgar H. Hart, for defendant in error; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0136-01",
  "first_page_order": 166,
  "last_page_order": 167
}