{
  "id": 5354852,
  "name": "Rose Cohn, Plaintiff in Error, v. M. J. Lewis et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cohn v. Lewis",
  "decision_date": "1913-01-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,586",
  "first_page": "272",
  "last_page": "273",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "176 Ill. App. 272"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "175 Ill. App. 380",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2752939
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/175/0380-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "172 Ill. App. 170",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5343502
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/172/0170-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "150 Ill. App. 179",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2636944
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/150/0179-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 2082,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.573,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15837602887272578
    },
    "sha256": "2873b8264ddf6366ddfeb55d06e8a33040a17c619424b86a9ec62d7df0e95cb8",
    "simhash": "1:b463f6271500ffd8",
    "word_count": 369
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:47:28.669055+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rose Cohn, Plaintiff in Error, v. M. J. Lewis et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nA motion has been made in this case to strike from the transcript of the record an instrument designated \u201ca correct statement of facts of the proceedings had on the trial of said cause and a correct statement of such other proceedings in the case to be reviewed.\u201d\nAn examination of the document shows it does not conform to the statute. There is no certificate of the trial judge that it is a correct statement of facts appearing upon the trial and of the questions of law involved and of the decisions of the court thereon. We find in the record an order extending the time in which to file a stenographic report, hut none was filed. The motion is granted. Seehausen Wehrs & Co. v. Interstate S. & I. Co., 150 Ill. App. 179; Levy v. Frohlich & Co., 172 Ill. App. 170; Allen v. Roughan, 175 Ill. App. 380.\nA further motion is made that the writ of error be dismissed. We find no assignment of error which can be considered in the absence of a \u201cstenographic report of the proceedings had at the trial,\u201d or a \u201ccorrect statement of the facts,\u201d etc., as required by paragraph 6 of section 23 of the Municipal Court Act. The writ of error will therefore be dismissed.\nWrit of error dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph Kohn, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Sabbath, Levinson & Stafford, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rose Cohn, Plaintiff in Error, v. M. J. Lewis et al., Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 18,586.\nMunicipal court\u2014certificate of trial court. The appellate court may on motion-strike from the transcript of the record an instrument designated \u201ca correct statement of facts of the proceedings on the trial and of such other proceedings in the case to be reviewed,\u201d where there is no certificate of the trial judge that it is a correct statement of facts appearing on the trial and of the questions of law involved and of the decisions of the court thereon as required by the Municipal Court Act.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nWrit of error dismissed.\nOpinion filed January 8, 1913.\nJoseph Kohn, for plaintiff in error.\nSabbath, Levinson & Stafford, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0272-01",
  "first_page_order": 302,
  "last_page_order": 303
}