{
  "id": 2816138,
  "name": "George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phelps ex rel. Mecartney v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1913-01-27",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 16,877",
  "first_page": "25",
  "last_page": "25",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "177 Ill. App. 25"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "150 Ill. App. 281",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2638401,
        2636077
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/150/0281-01",
        "/ill-app/150/0281-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1102,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.4033266686372354e-08,
      "percentile": 0.339319010490573
    },
    "sha256": "9b6377e4d2d69c4470bf95c02c35fc45f9d51989d6face3db7beb83a90b7d8d3",
    "simhash": "1:3a5d5fb27e511380",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:19:36.081100+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis case was before this court on a former appeal and the opinion therein is reported in 150 Ill. App. 281. The situation is the same as that in Mecartney v. City of Chicago, ante, 23, in which an opinion is this day filed. The questions involved were decided on said former appeal against the appellant, and the law there announced is the law of the case on this appeal, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George A. Mason and Edgar R. Hart, for appellee; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel.",
      "Oliver & Mecartney and Enoch J. Price, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George D. Phelps for use of Harry S. Mecartney, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.\nGen. No. 16,877.\nAppeals and errors\u2014former appeal. Where a case comes before court of review the second time and the questions involved are the same, the former decision is binding and the judgment is affirmed.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jesse A. Baldwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 27, 1913.\nGeorge A. Mason and Edgar R. Hart, for appellee; Edward J. Brundage, of counsel.\nOliver & Mecartney and Enoch J. Price, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0025-01",
  "first_page_order": 43,
  "last_page_order": 43
}