{
  "id": 8499326,
  "name": "Moritz Ertl et al. v. Samuel Lehmann et al.; Mathias Freres, Appellee, v. Samuel Lehmann et al., on appeal of Louis Henry et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ertl v. Lehmann",
  "decision_date": "1913-03-04",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,168",
  "first_page": "38",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "178 Ill. App. 38"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1462,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "sha256": "017c2f7f5c22d4282de8860d8088ab7d90581fd16dd095ffd5785484cf4ce4c2",
    "simhash": "1:d3367a230a6be305",
    "word_count": 234
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:56:36.464744+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Moritz Ertl et al. v. Samuel Lehmann et al. Mathias Freres, Appellee, v. Samuel Lehmann et al., on appeal of Louis Henry et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\n\u2014 In this case an appeal has been attempted to he perfected from an order entered discharging a receiver appointed on a hill of foreclosure, and appointing another in his place.\nWe have no jurisdiction. The statute with respect to appeals from interlocutory orders regarding receivers (section 123, chapter 110, R. S.) is limited to an order \u201cappointing a receiver, or giving other or further powers or property to a receiver already appointed.\u201d The court, having appointed a receiver, has authority to substitute another for the one originally named, and his action in so doing is not subject to review. The \"appeal will therefore he dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph Kohh and Hektrt & RobiusoN, for certain appellants.",
      "Fred Plotke and George E. Swartz, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Moritz Ertl et al. v. Samuel Lehmann et al. Mathias Freres, Appellee, v. Samuel Lehmann et al., on appeal of Louis Henry et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 19,168.\nReceivers \u2014 substitution of. Under R. S. eh. 110, \u00a7123, limiting appeals from interlocutory orders regarding receivers to orders \u201cappointing a receiver or giving other or further powers or property to a receiver already appointed,\u201d the discharge of one receiver and. substitution of another is not subject to review.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Marcus A. Kavakagh, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed March 4, 1913.\nJoseph Kohh and Hektrt & RobiusoN, for certain appellants.\nFred Plotke and George E. Swartz, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0038-01",
  "first_page_order": 56,
  "last_page_order": 57
}