{
  "id": 880236,
  "name": "Leonard H. Mayer, Trading as Mayer's Garage, Defendant in Error, v. Astor Auto Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mayer v. Astor Auto Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-06-24",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,668",
  "first_page": "442",
  "last_page": "443",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 Ill. App. 442"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1846,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.552,
    "sha256": "bd5d6e6f33848b2834e10922b75e5cad9787378848362504ddfe9b91c91fd6d9",
    "simhash": "1:83ebcf1d0855b8dc",
    "word_count": 325
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:55.892129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Leonard H. Mayer, Trading as Mayer\u2019s Garage, Defendant in Error, v. Astor Auto Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThe defendant in error, Leonard H. Mayer, doing business as Mayer\u2019s Garage, sued the Astor Auto Company, plaintiff in error, for the balance on a bill for repairs and storage of certain automobiles of the plaintiff in error. The bill covers a period of a number of months. Most of the items were not disputed. The items in dispute were set out by the plaintiff in error, defendant below, in its affidavit of merits, in which it claimed that it was entitled to a credit from the plaintiff in the sum of $24.10, and specifying the items making up this amount. No evidence was offered by the plaintiff in error tending to show that it was entitled to this credit. The only evidence offered in the case was that of Leonard H. Mayer, who was called as a witness and gave testimony as to the items making up the sum of $24.10 and the other items contained in the defendant in error\u2019s statement of claim.\nUpon a consideration of the evidence, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below is correct and ought not to be disturbed. The judgment is affirmed.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas M. Headen, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Leonard H. Mayer, Trading as Mayer\u2019s Garage, Defendant in Error, v. Astor Auto Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 17,668.\nAppeals and errors\u2014when judgment sustained by evidence. In an action on a bill for repairs and storage of certain automobiles of defendant, where the evidence shows only a few items are in dispute and defendant produces no evidence to sustain his claim that he is entitled to credit, the judgment is affirmed.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward A. Dicker, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 24, 1913.\nThomas M. Headen, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0442-01",
  "first_page_order": 468,
  "last_page_order": 469
}
