{
  "id": 880194,
  "name": "Lillie Bertha Mooney, Defendant in Error, v. Charles A. Valentynowicz, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mooney v. Valentynowicz",
  "decision_date": "1913-06-24",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,826",
  "first_page": "428",
  "last_page": "428",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "181 Ill. App. 428"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1374,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.542,
    "sha256": "5e0b00c6f5299590b3a9e3762a25b0589a21ce87b79adc46dbf3868d9c607683",
    "simhash": "1:8acf45ad5ae78cbf",
    "word_count": 230
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:28:55.892129+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lillie Bertha Mooney, Defendant in Error, v. Charles A. Valentynowicz, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nJudgment was entered on a note for $126, in which judgment an attorney\u2019s fee of $15 was incorporated. This amount is mentioned in the cognovit, and the trial judge evidently did not observe that there was no provision in the note itself for attorney\u2019s fees. After judgment was entered it was opened and testimony heard on the question as to whether or not the note had been paid.\nWe think the court was correct in holding that payment had not been shown. The judgment will therefore be affirmed provided the defendant in error enters in this court within ten days a remittitur in the sum of $15. Otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.\nAffirmed on remittitur; otherwise reversed and remanded.\nMemittitur filed and judgment affirmed June 26,1913.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Amos Blume, for plaintiff in error.",
      "George J. Gilbert, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lillie Bertha Mooney, Defendant in Error, v. Charles A. Valentynowicz, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 17,826.\nNegotiable instruments\u2014when payment of note not shown. Held, that payment of a note on which action was brought was not shown.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. George J. Cowing, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed on remittitur.\nOpinion filed June 24, 1913.\nRehearing denied July 8, 1913.\nJ. Amos Blume, for plaintiff in error.\nGeorge J. Gilbert, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0428-01",
  "first_page_order": 454,
  "last_page_order": 454
}