#### City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Joseph Biel, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,212.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus T. Robinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 7, 1913.

*3Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and error, § 1713 * —argument of assignments of error in brief. Matters not argued .in brief for plaintiff in error are waived.

2. Appeal and error, § 956*—effect of striking bill of exceptions from record. Matters shown only in the bill of exceptions cannot be considered where such bill of exceptions has been stricken from the record.

Statement of the Case.

Prosecution on complaint against Joseph Biel for violation of section 2012 of the Municipal Code of Chicago. From a judgment imposing a fine of two hundred dollars and costs, defendant brings error.

Richard Donovan, for plaintiff in error.

William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.