{
  "id": 2829171,
  "name": "Patrick E. Hogan, Appellee, v. John Carlson, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hogan v. Carlson",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,865",
  "first_page": "21",
  "last_page": "21",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 21"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1476,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.57,
    "sha256": "f33035548e5a011db995567cfc0ca243c1b87f8a3dd68465545586b713e2899d",
    "simhash": "1:53e1b101d82ca219",
    "word_count": 245
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick E. Hogan, Appellee, v. John Carlson, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Childs & Childs, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick E. Hogan, Appellee, v. John Carlson, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,865.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bailments, \u00a7 11 \u2014care required of agisters. Whether a bailee under a contract of agistment is liable for the value of a horse which disappeared from pasture, held in this case to depend upon the condition of the fence surrounding the pasture.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1406*\u2014when verdict will not be disturbed as excessive. Verdict will not be.disturbed as excessive where a greater amount was recovered on a former trial, and the jury were better able to judge.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1410*\u2014when verdict not disturbed as against weight of the evidence. In determining whether a verdict is against the preponderance of the evidence the preponderance is not necessarily on the side of the greater number of witnesses.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nRehearing denied October 23, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Patrick E. Hogan against John Carlson for breach of a contract of agistment of a horse. From a judgment for plaintiff for two hundred dollars, defendant appeals.\nChilds & Childs, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0021-01",
  "first_page_order": 45,
  "last_page_order": 45
}