{
  "id": 2829035,
  "name": "William E. Hatterman, Appellant, v. Mary L. Tieman et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hatterman v. Tieman",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,960",
  "first_page": "24",
  "last_page": "25",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 24"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1481,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "sha256": "9d75a293574b26348c7f6a31719b23a6d6cba5782b1ea9237db207c2cd35a342",
    "simhash": "1:4f79c10450af980a",
    "word_count": 246
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William E. Hatterman, Appellant, v. Mary L. Tieman et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 789*\u2014when hill of exceptions unnecessary. Bill of exceptions in a chancery cause is neither necessary nor proper, unless it he to preserve oral evidence introduced upon the hearing under the statute allowing it to be done.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 855*\u2014when certificate of evidence not necessary. Evidence need not be preserved by a certificate of the chancellor when there is a report of the master in chancery. The master\u2019s report is a part of the record.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William D. Johnson, for appellant.",
      "Geeting, Potts & VanDellen, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William E. Hatterman, Appellant, v. Mary L. Tieman et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 17,960.\n(Not to foe reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 886 \u2014what abstract of record must include. Ruling on objections and exceptions to a master\u2019s report cannot be considered when such objections and exceptions are not included in the abstract of record.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ear-tin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nCreditor\u2019s bill filed by William. E. Hatterman against Mary L. Tieman and others to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent. From an order dismissing the bill for want of equity, plaintiff appeals.\nWilliam D. Johnson, for appellant.\nGeeting, Potts & VanDellen, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, game topic and section, number."
  },
  "file_name": "0024-01",
  "first_page_order": 48,
  "last_page_order": 49
}