{
  "id": 2833766,
  "name": "Margerete Hengen, Appellee, v. Gustave B. Hengen, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hengen v. Hengen",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,002",
  "first_page": "25",
  "last_page": "26",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 25"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1726,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 3.6856254361847664e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8918527682501953
    },
    "sha256": "299067d200c4bf4a24db9cf57767223bbd3d0a7611fd946085ac6969d62634d7",
    "simhash": "1:836898de10cea148",
    "word_count": 272
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Margerete Hengen, Appellee, v. Gustave B. Hengen, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Husband and wife, \u00a7 234 \u2014when wife entitled to allowance of temporary alimony and solicitor's fees. Wife apparently suing for separate maintenance in good faith is entitled to temporary alimony and attorney\u2019s fees, notwithstanding husband\u2019s answer charges her with adultery, since the time for determining such issue is upon trial to the merits.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1357*\u2014when amount allowed as temporary alimony not an atuse of discretion. Claim of husband that most of his property produces no income, held not to warrant Appellate Court in interfering with discretion of chancellor as to amount allowed for temporary alimony.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. G. Lancaster, for appellant.",
      "Patrick H. O\u2019Donnell and C. A. Toolen, for appellee; James Hartnett, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Margerete Hengen, Appellee, v. Gustave B. Hengen, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,002.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Husband and wife, \u00a7 233\u2014when right to temporary alimony presumed. Wife suing for separate maintenance is presumed entitled to temporary alimony.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nRehearing denied October 23, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Margerete Hengen against Gustave B. Hengen for separate maintenance. From an order allowing plaintiff temporary alimony of one hundred fifty dollars per month and two hundred dollars solicitor\u2019s fees, defendant appeals.\nE. G. Lancaster, for appellant.\nPatrick H. O\u2019Donnell and C. A. Toolen, for appellee; James Hartnett, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0025-01",
  "first_page_order": 49,
  "last_page_order": 50
}