{
  "id": 2828371,
  "name": "George R. Neff, Defendant in Error, v. Forrest J. Alvin, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neff v. Alvin",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,637",
  "first_page": "41",
  "last_page": "42",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 41"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1500,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3225674547048882
    },
    "sha256": "504168de56ab90b28ec48d0f627e5b4683286991b92045b5a4b09c8188fd8c8e",
    "simhash": "1:df73c505601d193c",
    "word_count": 241
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George R. Neff, Defendant in Error, v. Forrest J. Alvin, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Fitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Fitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ernest Saunders and Frank A. Ramacitti, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George R. Neff, Defendant in Error, v. Forrest J. Alvin, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 17,637.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Aetetob W. Deselm, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Attachment, \u00a7 230 \u2014when defects in process, waived by general appearance. Defendant In attachment by coming in to court and filing a motion that plaintiff be ordered to file statement of claim, waives all objections to process by publication.\n2. Attachment, \u00a7 93*\u2014presumption, when no jurat to affidavit. After attachment writ has issued, it will be presumed that affidavit was in fact sworn to, though not so certified by a jurat.\n3. Appeal and eebob, \u00a7 390*\u2014when objections for irregularities in attachment, not preserved. Defects in attachment affidavit, attachment writ, and attachment bond held mere irregularities, for which objections come too late when first made in Appellate Court.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction \"by George R. Neff against Forrest J. Alvin in attachment upon a claim for attorney\u2019s fees. From a judgment sustaining the attachment and awarding plaintiff seventy-five dollars, defendant brings error.\nErnest Saunders and Frank A. Ramacitti, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0041-01",
  "first_page_order": 65,
  "last_page_order": 66
}