{
  "id": 2829805,
  "name": "Charles R. Kappes, Appellee, v. American Linseed Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kappes v. American Linseed Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,947",
  "first_page": "68",
  "last_page": "69",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 68"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1328,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "sha256": "1ba891a3fb7796aae8b14071ce3cc332a446a056539c13d31c233350fddf0421",
    "simhash": "1:417ba31570adc88c",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles R. Kappes, Appellee, v. American Linseed Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Fitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Costs, \u00a7 67 \u2014when statutory damages warranted for prosecuting an appeal for delay. Verdict and judgment held so clearly right as to justify statutory damages for prosecuting appeal for delay.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Fitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William C. Hartray and Johnson & Belasco, for appellant.",
      "Gann, Peaks & Townley, for appellee; Amos C. Miller, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles R. Kappes, Appellee, v. American Linseed Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,947.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1463 \u2014when error in refusing to strike out testimony, harmless. Where the evidence is such as to justify the conclusion that a different verdict could not be rendered, error in refusing to strike out certain testimony is immaterial.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max H. Ebebhabdt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed with damages.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Charles E. Kappes against American Linseed Company, a corporation, to- recover commissions for selling certain real estate belonging to defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for one thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars, defendant appeals.\nWilliam C. Hartray and Johnson & Belasco, for appellant.\nGann, Peaks & Townley, for appellee; Amos C. Miller, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0068-01",
  "first_page_order": 92,
  "last_page_order": 93
}