{
  "id": 2833292,
  "name": "Bernard McQuillen et al., Appellees, v. Matteo Mazzone, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "McQuillen v. Mazzone",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,937",
  "first_page": "133",
  "last_page": "134",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 133"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 171,
    "char_count": 1954,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "f9ab2765680f8ea51aaa3c2c362d1238e0c173861746239016018f439d466055",
    "simhash": "1:29779f16c62bba98",
    "word_count": 326
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bernard McQuillen et al., Appellees, v. Matteo Mazzone, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gridley\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gridley"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rocco DeStefano, for appellant.",
      "Louis Shissler and John A. Stagg, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bernard McQuillen et al., Appellees, v. Matteo Mazzone, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,937.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the' Hon. Mazzini Slusseb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nRehearing denied .Qctober 23, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\n'Action by Bernard McQuillen and others against Matteo Mazzone to recover money claimed to be due as rent for certain premises occupied by defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for nine hundred and sixty dollars, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Landloed and tenant, \u00a7 321 \u2014when certificate of sale to tenant not admissible in suit for rent. In an action against a tenant in possession for rent, a certified copy of a master\u2019s certificate of sale to defendant is not admissible to show that defendant is not accountable for the rent.\n2. Landloed and tenant, \u00a7 131*\u2014when tenant estopped from denying landlord\u2019s title. A tenant in possession is estopped from denying title of his landlord, and he must surrender possession before he can assail that title or set up title in himself.\n3. Landloed and tenant. \u00a7 321*\u2014when evidence of a claim for repairs by tenant, inadmissible. In an action for rent under a lease requiring lessee to keep premises in repair at his own expense and to make no alterations except with lessor\u2019s consent, evidence offered by defendant of a claim for repairs made by him without lessor\u2019s consent, held inadmissible.\n4. Mobtgages, \u00a7 607*\u2014rights of holder of certificate of sale. Holder of a certificate of sale is not entitled to possession of the premises or to the rents, issues or profits thereof during the period of redemption.\nRocco DeStefano, for appellant.\nLouis Shissler and John A. Stagg, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0133-01",
  "first_page_order": 157,
  "last_page_order": 158
}