{
  "id": 2829088,
  "name": "The Quality Car Company, Appellee, v. J. J. Corkill, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Quality Car Co. v. Corkill",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,375",
  "first_page": "175",
  "last_page": "176",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 175"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1316,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "sha256": "851f0715260e65e697261d62e8329f63e434d6129252738d77ea324aee55abbb",
    "simhash": "1:101dc7049027a3d5",
    "word_count": 219
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Quality Car Company, Appellee, v. J. J. Corkill, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gbidley\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bills and notes, \u00a7 27 \u2014sufficiency of delivery. A delivery of a note to an agent of the payee is a sufficient delivery.\n2. Bills and notes, \u00a7 121*\u2014authority to indorse. No particular form of appointment is necessary to authorize a person to indorse a promissory note as agent.\n3. Bills and notes, \u00a7 375*\u2014\"burden of proof. Introduction of a promissory note in evidence without objection makes a prima facie case for plaintiff, and the burden of proving that the note was without consideration and was a mere accommodation note is upon the defendant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gbidley"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Adams, Cahdee, Steere & Hawley, for appellant.",
      "Miller, Gorham & Wales, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Quality Car Company, Appellee, v. J. J. Corkill, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,375.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the. Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Ebbkhabdt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 9, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by The Quality Car Company, a corporation, against J. J. Corkill to recover on a promissory note given by defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for two thousand dollars, defendant appeals.\nAdams, Cahdee, Steere & Hawley, for appellant.\nMiller, Gorham & Wales, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0175-01",
  "first_page_order": 199,
  "last_page_order": 200
}