{
  "id": 2829726,
  "name": "Anna Grossmann, Appellee, v. Frank Grossmann, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Grossmann v. Grossmann",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,969",
  "first_page": "218",
  "last_page": "219",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 218"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1541,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "9b2d16d3cd44e9746650f3355411330ccd848b614c247631095be6b3d7d57dad",
    "simhash": "1:296e8d90d6aba05d",
    "word_count": 258
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anna Grossmann, Appellee, v. Frank Grossmann, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Matthew J. Huss and Robert R. Mix, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Anna Grossmann, Appellee, v. Frank Grossmann, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,969.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. William Fenimoee Cooper, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 13, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill in chancery by Anna Grossmann against Frank Grossmann for separate maintenance. From a decree directing the defendant to pay the complainant five dollars per week for her support, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Husband and wine, \u00a7 2\u201967 \u2014what is necessary to support a decree on appeal. To sustain a decree for separate maintenance, on appeal, the party in whose favor such decree is rendered must in some way preserve the evidence or the decree must find the specific facts proved on the hearing.\n2. Appeal and ebrob, \u00a7 1269*\u2014what evidence will be presumed to have been heard. There is no presumption on appeal that evidence not appearing in the record was heard in support of a decree.\n3. Appeal and ebrob, \u00a7 855*\u2014when certificate of evidence is .necessary. A decree for separate maintenance, finding that \u201cthe allegations of the bill of complaint are true as therein stated,\u201d states only a conclusion and is not sufficient to supply the place of a certificate of evidence.\nMatthew J. Huss and Robert R. Mix, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vola. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0218-01",
  "first_page_order": 242,
  "last_page_order": 243
}