{
  "id": 2828348,
  "name": "N. S. Sherman, trading as N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works, Appellee, v. Kennicott Water Softener Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sherman v. Kennicott Water Softener Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,904",
  "first_page": "291",
  "last_page": "292",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 291"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1155,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "sha256": "793813c623e9d67b70ff95d88215234da8c04c3a4d3a39346100738f683fe7cb",
    "simhash": "1:1977700f50a0aa9d",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "N. S. Sherman, trading as N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works, Appellee, v. Kennicott Water Softener Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. A. Hood, for appellant.",
      "Lindhout & Lihdhout, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "N. S. Sherman, trading as N. S. Sherman Machine & Iron Works, Appellee, v. Kennicott Water Softener Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,904.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the City Court of Chicago Heights; the Hon. Homes Abbott, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 13, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction on contract by N. S. Sherman, doing business as N. S. Sherman Machine and Iron Works, against Kennicott Water Softener Company. From a judgment for four hundred and eighty dollars for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nC. A. Hood, for appellant.\nLindhout & Lihdhout, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nCorporations, \u00a7 353 \u2014when corporation is hound hy acts of its agents. Where the evidence showed that an agent for a corporation managed all the business relating to the work and accepted the offer for the erection of a smoke stack for such corporation, it could not be contended that such agent had no power to contract in behalf of the corporation.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0291-01",
  "first_page_order": 315,
  "last_page_order": 316
}