{
  "id": 2832804,
  "name": "Benjamin Schwartz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schwartz v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,466",
  "first_page": "338",
  "last_page": "339",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 338"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1377,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "sha256": "9507d6df934558823dde0f8c9daf935ddad81113cb3c94e98743655525275d34",
    "simhash": "1:8b67b894590d905e",
    "word_count": 221
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin Schwartz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sabath, Levinson & Stafford, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Goldizer, Rodgers & Froelich, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin Schwartz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 18,466.\n(Not to foe reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Freeman K. Blake, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 14, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nActions by Benjamin Schwartz against AnheuserBusch Brewing Association, a corporation, to recover rent for three months. The actions were consolidated in the trial court. From a judgment for plaintiff for $10.85, plaintiff brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Tbial, \u00a7 299 \u2014when proposition of law may he refused. Propositions of law not involved in the case are properly refused.\n2. Landlobd and tenant, \u00a7 441 \u2014when evidence insufficient to establish renewal of lease. In an action fpr rent, a finding of fact that defendant remained in possession of the premises after the expiration of the lease and a finding of fact that a check received hy plaintiff for rent was not sent hy defendant by mistake, held properly refused as not sustained by the evidence.\nSabath, Levinson & Stafford, for plaintiff in error.\nGoldizer, Rodgers & Froelich, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0338-01",
  "first_page_order": 362,
  "last_page_order": 363
}