{
  "id": 2829959,
  "name": "J. W. Goggin, Defendant in Error, v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Goggin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,385",
  "first_page": "387",
  "last_page": "387",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 387"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1081,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.4033266686372354e-08,
      "percentile": 0.33933387622212724
    },
    "sha256": "e06a64217d435319de547ee9e6582b753dd475301e6f4b638367214238d8f781",
    "simhash": "1:57549825508f829c",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. W. Goggin, Defendant in Error, v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Clark\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Clark"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "West & Eckhart, for plaintiff in error.",
      "George M. Weichelt, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. W. Goggin, Defendant in Error, v. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,385.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 28 \u2014when propositions of law are necessary. Under section 61 of the Practice Act, J. & A. fl 8598, as to tendering propositons of law to be passed upon, which section has been adopted by the rules of the Municipal Court, such propositions are necessary to save questions for review.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. New-comes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 14, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by J. W. Goggin against Western Union Telegraph Company for damages dne to a mistake in transmitting a telegram. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error. .\nWest & Eckhart, for plaintiff in error.\nGeorge M. Weichelt, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0387-01",
  "first_page_order": 411,
  "last_page_order": 411
}