{
  "id": 2833338,
  "name": "The Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company, Appellee, v. Herman C. Lelivet, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co. v. Lelivet",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 17,881",
  "first_page": "436",
  "last_page": "437",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 436"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1483,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "sha256": "7da18be7bd892799f971333728a519113d3dfbcd33fae5efd8ca7c1ba6c977d9",
    "simhash": "1:096eaaa008ae6381",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company, Appellee, v. Herman C. Lelivet, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baume\ndelivered the \"opinion of the court.\n2. Novation, \u00a7 1 \u2014what constitutes. . A novation exists where' a contractor refuses to pay an order drawn upon him by a subcontractor in favor of a material man, but -subsequently pays half of the claim of the material man in consideration of a waiver of lien and agrees to pay the balance of the claim at ax certain time.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. W. Balcome, for appellant.",
      "Rice & O\u2019Neil, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company, Appellee, v. Herman C. Lelivet, Appellant.\nGen. No. 17,881.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bills and notes, \u00a7 39 \u2014when acceptance is necessary. TJnr.ar Negotiable Instruments Act, \u00a7\u00a7 125, 131, J. & A., |f 7765, 7771, no recovery can be had upon a written order of a subcontractor on a contractor directing him to pay a specified sum of money to a material man when such order, or bill of exchange, is not accepted by the contractor. 0 \u2022 \u2022\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. John E. Owens, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 15, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction \"by the Wisconsin Lime & Cement Company against Herman C. Lelivet on contract. From a judgment for plaintiff for one hundred and seventy-five dollars, defendant appeals.\nF. W. Balcome, for appellant.\nRice & O\u2019Neil, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XXV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0436-01",
  "first_page_order": 460,
  "last_page_order": 461
}