{
  "id": 2833207,
  "name": "Claude B. Davis, Defendant in Error, v. Max J. Strauch and Wilhelmina Strauch, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Davis v. Strauch",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,079",
  "first_page": "451",
  "last_page": "452",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 451"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1198,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.511,
    "sha256": "3c2192076706ba5c5e65698da39466a8c582b9444c5b7b87c24ae7a6532d68ba",
    "simhash": "1:dd75bda141ae53b8",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Claude B. Davis, Defendant in Error, v. Max J. Strauch and Wilhelmina Strauch, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Daniel V. Harkin and Dillard B. Baker, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Gteorge M. Stevens, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Claude B. Davis, Defendant in Error, v. Max J. Strauch and Wilhelmina Strauch, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 18,079.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Mazzini Slusser, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 15, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and bebop, \u00a7 866 \u2014what abstract must contain. A purported abstract which is a mere index of the record is wholly insufficient to present questions for review.\n2. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 787*\u2014when bill of exceptions is necessary. A bill of particulars and certain motions and affidavits which appear in a record can only he properly preserved hy a hill of exceptions.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Claude B. Davis, trading as Claude B. Davis & Company, against Max J. Straueh and Wilhelmina Straueh. From a judgment for plaintiffs for two hundred and eight dollars, defendant brings error.\nDaniel V. Harkin and Dillard B. Baker, for plaintiffs in error.\nGteorge M. Stevens, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0451-02",
  "first_page_order": 475,
  "last_page_order": 476
}