{
  "id": 2828797,
  "name": "Ferdinand W. Jaros, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward Johanning and A. M. Wertzberger, Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jaros v. Johanning",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,155",
  "first_page": "453",
  "last_page": "454",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 453"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1200,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "sha256": "1b286ae2510a1f4a89874ff96b98547980533e3441e64e2f3bda28537c07b6a6",
    "simhash": "1:4b2e8a83018b98bc",
    "word_count": 196
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ferdinand W. Jaros, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward Johanning and A. M. Wertzberger, Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baume\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baume"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. W. Jaros, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Oscar M. Lumby, for defendants in error Edward Johanning."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ferdinand W. Jaros, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward Johanning and A. M. Wertzberger, Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 18,155.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 15, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nTrial \u00a7 46 \u2014what acts of judge are improper. In an action for legal services where the evidence was closely conflicting, held that the action of the trial judge in reading the defendant\u2019s affidavit of merits to the jury before instructing them was prejudicial error, since the reading of such affidavit unduly emphasized the defendant\u2019s view of the controversy the plaintiff\u2019s statement of claim not having been read.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Ferdinand W. Jaros against Edward Johanning and A. M. Wertzberger for legal services. From a judgment for plaintiff for $3.50, plaintiff brings error.\nF. W. Jaros, for plaintiff in error.\nOscar M. Lumby, for defendants in error Edward Johanning.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0453-01",
  "first_page_order": 477,
  "last_page_order": 478
}