{
  "id": 2830171,
  "name": "Gust Peretes, Defendant in Error, v. John Tompary and Peter Tompary, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peretes v. Tompary",
  "decision_date": "1913-10-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,127",
  "first_page": "495",
  "last_page": "496",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 495"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1164,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "sha256": "a647be3f9894f67c5d5ac6b0ec88b894bd20b78713562101570a4e2aa71f3fc7",
    "simhash": "1:5554cb2950ab239a",
    "word_count": 198
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Gust Peretes, Defendant in Error, v. John Tompary and Peter Tompary, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Duncan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Duncan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Caswell & Healy, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Gust Peretes, Defendant in Error, v. John Tompary and Peter Tompary, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 18,127.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James C. Martin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed October 15, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Set-off and becotjpment, \u00a7 13 \u2014when mutuality is essential. A debt due from a copartnership of two or three members sued jointly cannot be offset by a debt due from a plaintiff to one of such firm.\n2. Judgments, \u00a7 63*\u2014when set aside. Denial of motion to open a judgment by confession, held erroneous where an affidavit of defendant disclosed a good defense and the right to set-off.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Gust Peretes against John Tompary and Peter Tompary. On denial of a motion by defendants to open up a judgment by confession, such defendants bring error.\nCaswell & Healy, for plaintiffs in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0495-01",
  "first_page_order": 519,
  "last_page_order": 520
}