{
  "id": 2828091,
  "name": "Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellee, v. John Framasetta, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Framasetta",
  "decision_date": "1913-08-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,784",
  "first_page": "539",
  "last_page": "540",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "182 Ill. App. 539"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1061,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "37da5ab42837a456f376c760a724ee76792862836f5fa57525d00c24831d2959",
    "simhash": "1:5af9ca939ab91a85",
    "word_count": 175
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:04:20.195306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellee, v. John Framasetta, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. L. Spaulding, for appellant.",
      "Mastin & Sherlock and George S. Skinner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellee, v. John Framasetta, Appellant.\nGen. No. 5,784.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau county; the Hon. Job A. Davis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed August 2, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill for an injunction by Spring Valley Coal Company against John Framasetta. From a decree granting such injunction, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Injunction, \u00a7 206*\u2014what evidence is admissible to show breach. In an action to enjoin the sale of intoxicating liquors on certain premises in violation of a covenant in a deed, the allegations of the bill may be proved by direct or circumstantial evidence or both.\n2. Covenants, \u00a7 15*\u2014when breach is shown. Evidence held to show the sale of intoxicating liquor on certain premises in violation ' of a covenant in a warranty deed.\nJ. L. Spaulding, for appellant.\nMastin & Sherlock and George S. Skinner, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0539-01",
  "first_page_order": 563,
  "last_page_order": 564
}