#### Pauline Siess, Defendant in Error, v. Robert Banzuly, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 18,641.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Evidence, § 476 * —number of witnesses does not determine weight. A judgment for a plaintiff in an action on a breach of contract for employment will not be reversed merely because there were two witnesses against one.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 4, 1913.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Pauline Siess against Robert Banzuly for damages from a breach of contract for employment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

William Daniel Johnson, for plaintiff in error.

Harold D. Huszagh, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.