{
  "id": 2834509,
  "name": "A. S. Hall, Appellee, v. Herbert D. Blakemore, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hall v. Blakemore",
  "decision_date": "1913-08-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,791",
  "first_page": "19",
  "last_page": "20",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 19"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 169,
    "char_count": 1803,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "sha256": "f570f2658709ca35d91f3866f8aa7cf012076229ac9bd07240d3be84e6182e8c",
    "simhash": "1:13639c4c1001a799",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. S. Hall, Appellee, v. Herbert D. Blakemore, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. T. & S. R. Kenworthy, for appellant.",
      "Adair Pleasants, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. S. Hall, Appellee, v. Herbert D. Blakemore, Appellant.\nGen. No. 5,791.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Rock Island, county; the Hon. Robert W. Olmsted, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed August 2, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nReplevin by A. S. Hall against Herbert D. Blake-more to recover possession of a typewriter alleged to have been loaned defendant by plaintiff. The typewriter not having been found, the action was changed to trover. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for forty dollars, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Troves, \u00a7 39 \u2014proof of plaintiff\u2019s ownership. Plaintiff sufficiently proves his ownership by showing that he remitted the pricq thereof to the original owner, in the absence of proof that remittance had been returned or the transaction repudiated.\n2. Troves, \u00a7 38 \u2014when affidavit in former replevin^suit not competent. An affidavit for replevin in a former suit by a different party not competent on issue of ownership.\n3. Trover, \u00a7 38 \u2014when evidence of a prior suit inadmissible. Evidence offered by defendant of a prior replevin suit brought against him by a different party for different property, held, inadmissible.\n4. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1506 \u2014when exclusion of question on cross-examination, not reversible error. Refusal of court to allow certain questions to be answered by a witness on cross-examination cannot be complained of where the party afterwards has opportunity to question the witness with reference thereto on direct examination and fails to do so.\nJ. T. & S. R. Kenworthy, for appellant.\nAdair Pleasants, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0019-01",
  "first_page_order": 41,
  "last_page_order": 42
}