{
  "id": 2833347,
  "name": "States Printing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Leven Advertising Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "States Printing Co. v. Leven Advertising Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-11-04",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,571",
  "first_page": "178",
  "last_page": "179",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 178"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1286,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.502,
    "sha256": "befe2f374f5693d3d59f11bdf547a341f218776b0eefb5e217644c20c3946377",
    "simhash": "1:46734c24544af0cd",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "States Printing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Leven Advertising Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nPrincipal and agent, \u00a7 181*\u2014when agent contracting as principal, personally liable. In an action for printing of booklets and envelopes for the use of a third party, finding of trial court that defendant was liable on account of having ordered and supervised the printing work done, held sustained by the evidence.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice F. A. Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Isaac S. Rothschild, for plaintiff in error; Hugo M. Friend, of counsel.",
      "Nathan S. Schoenbrod and Blum & Blum, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "States Printing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Leven Advertising Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 18,571.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles E. Jennings, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 4, 1913.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Currier Printing Company, a corporation, whose name was later changed to the States Printing Company, against Leven-Nichols Advertising Company, a corporation, whose name was later changed to Leven Advertising Company, on a claim for printing done by the plaintiff on the order of the defendant. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $172.50, defendant brings error.\nIsaac S. Rothschild, for plaintiff in error; Hugo M. Friend, of counsel.\nNathan S. Schoenbrod and Blum & Blum, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0178-01",
  "first_page_order": 200,
  "last_page_order": 201
}