{
  "id": 2838475,
  "name": "Stanislaw Jvanowski, Appellee, v. Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jvanowski v. Spring Valley Coal Co.",
  "decision_date": "1913-11-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,451",
  "first_page": "232",
  "last_page": "233",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "183 Ill. App. 232"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 165,
    "char_count": 1964,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "95df086c225937facd61812c1d6ed02ac7024634a1202c9d3275c7849c76209a",
    "simhash": "1:d966f884582c427d",
    "word_count": 321
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:27.806602+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Stanislaw Jvanowski, Appellee, v. Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Fitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Fitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mast\u00edn & Sherlock, for appellant; Frank Crozier, of counsel.",
      "Johnson & Belasco, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Stanislaw Jvanowski, Appellee, v. Spring Valley Coal Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 18,451.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William Fenimore Cooper, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 20, 1913.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Mines and minerals, \u00a7 90 \u2014when a demand for props may be made of driver. Where there is a rule that the men are required to make their demand for props of the manager, a demand made upon the driver for such props is sufficient where there is a custom established in the mine to ask the driver therefor.\n2. Mines and minerals, \u00a7 156 \u2014when evidence of custom to demand props of driver admissible. Evidence of a custom to demand props of the driver, instead of the manager, is admissible though, such custom is not pleaded.\n3. Mines and minerals, \u00a7 194 \u2014when refusal of requested instruction reversible error. In an action for injuries sustained for wilful failure of mine owner to furnish props, where plaintiff relies on his demand upon the driver therefor in accordance with an established custom, refusal of a requested instruction informing the jury as to the legal effect of the evidence relating to the alleged custom, field error where such requested instruction was not covered by other instructions given.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Stanislaw Jvanowski against Spring Valley Coal Company to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while employed as a miner in . defendant\u2019s mines, on account of defendant\u2019s wilful failure to supply plaintiff with props. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for two thousand five hundred dollars, defendant appeals.\nMast\u00edn & Sherlock, for appellant; Frank Crozier, of counsel.\nJohnson & Belasco, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XIV, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0232-01",
  "first_page_order": 254,
  "last_page_order": 255
}